# Pi-hole vs racktables

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | racktables |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #16 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 61 546 ✓ | 813 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +484 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 47/100 for racktables, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for racktables.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; racktables needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [racktables](https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/racktables.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-racktables