# Pi-hole vs PruneMate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | PruneMate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 ✓ | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.

PruneMate ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [PruneMate](https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prunemate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-prunemate