# Pi-hole vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Pi-hole | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 536 ✓ | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +492 ✓ | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Zlib |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 77/100 for Portainer, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pi-hole-vs-portainer