pi-dispatchvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pi-dispatch | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #50 of 125 in AI | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 188 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.3.1 · 14 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 50/100 for pi-dispatch, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pi-dispatch.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; pi-dispatch needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
pi-dispatch details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep pi-dispatch, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with