PhotoPrismvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoPrism | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism details →Zammad details →