# PhotoPrism vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 ✓ | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-whisperlive-cpu