# PhotoPrism vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-uusec-waf