# PhotoPrism vs unraid-config-guardian

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | unraid-config-guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #38 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.6.1 · 16 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 46/100 for unraid-config-guardian, so it is the safer default.

unraid-config-guardian ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [unraid-config-guardian](https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unraid-config-guardian.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-unraid-config-guardian