# PhotoPrism vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-typetype