PhotoPrismvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoPrism | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
PhotoPrism details →TypeType details →