PhotoPrismvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoPrism | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
PhotoPrism details →transfer.sh details →