# PhotoPrism vs TraceRoot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | TraceRoot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 40 370 ✓ | 1 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 ✓ | +33 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.

TraceRoot ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [TraceRoot](https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traceroot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-traceroot