# PhotoPrism vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-supabase-automated-self-host