# PhotoPrism vs supa-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | supa-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 40 372 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [supa-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-supa-manager