# PhotoPrism vs statusnook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | statusnook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 40 370 ✓ | 988 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 51/100 for statusnook, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for statusnook.

If you want the quickest setup, statusnook is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [statusnook](https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/statusnook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-statusnook