# PhotoPrism vs Qtap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | Qtap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 40 369 ✓ | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, PhotoPrism is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-qtap