# PhotoPrism vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 ✓ | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +232 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-pulse