# PhotoPrism vs Portainer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoPrism | Portainer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 40 373 ✓ | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +140 | +188 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Zlib |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Portainer scores 77/100 against 76/100 for PhotoPrism, so it is the safer default.

Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.

## Details

- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)
- [Portainer](https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portainer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photoprism-vs-portainer