# PhotoMigrator vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoMigrator | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 269 | 60 065 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 607 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Twenty.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 607 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photomigrator-vs-twenty