# PhotoMigrator vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PhotoMigrator | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 269 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +111 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.

PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PhotoMigrator](https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photomigrator.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/photomigrator-vs-srs