pH7BuildervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pH7Builder | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 062 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v19.3.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 57/100 for pH7Builder, so it is the safer default.
pH7Builder ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; pH7Builder needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
pH7Builder details →Stash details →