pH7BuildervsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pH7Builder | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 062 | 45 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 639 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 |
| Latest release | v19.3.2 · 15 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 57/100 for pH7Builder, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pH7Builder.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; pH7Builder needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 639 stars in 30 days).
pH7Builder details →Reactive Resume details →