# Percona Server for MySQL vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Percona Server for MySQL | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 1 280 | 24 037 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +777 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 61/100 for Percona Server for MySQL, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Percona Server for MySQL.

If you want the quickest setup, Percona Server for MySQL is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+777 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Percona Server for MySQL](https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/percona-server-for-mysql-vs-temporal