# Percona Server for MySQL vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Percona Server for MySQL | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 280 | 61 527 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +483 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 61/100 for Percona Server for MySQL, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Percona Server for MySQL.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Percona Server for MySQL](https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/percona-server-for-mysql-vs-pi-hole