# penpot vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | penpot | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 61 805 ✓ | 16 062 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 463 ✓ | +239 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 463 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/penpot-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap