# penpot vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | penpot | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 61 814 | 93 048 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 472 ✓ | +1 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 84/100 for penpot, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/penpot-vs-uptime-kuma