# penpot vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | penpot | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 61 823 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 481 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 481 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/penpot-vs-tube-archivist