# penpot vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | penpot | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 801 ✓ | 45 007 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 489 | +1 634 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 84/100 for penpot, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/penpot-vs-reactive-resume