penpotvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| penpot | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 61 801 | 45 007 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 489 | +1 634 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 34 |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 84/100 for penpot, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep penpot, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with