# penpot vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | penpot | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 61 801 ✓ | 35 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 489 ✓ | +529 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Clojure | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 82/100 for qdrant, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/penpot-vs-qdrant