penpotvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| penpot | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 30 in Collaboration | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 61 801 | 27 733 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 489 | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 20 |
| Latest release | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Clojure | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 79/100 for PostgREST, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 489 stars in 30 days).
penpot details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep penpot, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with