# pellicola vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pellicola | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 4 115 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 45/100 for pellicola, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, pellicola is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.

Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pellicola](https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pellicola-vs-tika