# pellicola vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pellicola | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 45/100 for pellicola, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pellicola.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pellicola](https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pellicola-vs-stash