# pellicola vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pellicola | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 19 in Photo Galleries | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 45 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 644 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 45/100 for pellicola, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pellicola.

If you want the quickest setup, pellicola is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 644 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pellicola](https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pellicola-vs-reactive-resume