# PeerTube vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +161 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+161 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-woodpecker-ci