# PeerTube vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 15 376 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-unbagrnd