# PeerTube vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 15 372 | 15 908 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-transfersh