# PeerTube vs tg-spam

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | tg-spam |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 4 in Anti-Spam |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 454 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.29.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 52/100 for tg-spam, so it is the safer default.

tg-spam ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, tg-spam is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [tg-spam](https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tg-spam.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-tg-spam