# PeerTube vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-syncwatch