PeerTubevsSnort
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | Snort | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 15 374 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 4 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Snort.
If you want the quickest setup, Snort is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
PeerTube details →Snort details →