# PeerTube vs skyvern

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | skyvern |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 15 374 | 23 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +237 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 26 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube and skyvern score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, skyvern is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

skyvern is growing faster right now (+237 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [skyvern](https://selfhost.directory/project/skyvern) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skyvern.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-skyvern