# PeerTube vs Rainbond

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | Rainbond |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 6 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v6.10.1-release · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rainbond.

If you want the quickest setup, Rainbond is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [Rainbond](https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rainbond.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-rainbond