# PeerTube vs pr-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | pr-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 13 688 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +545 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.

pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, pr-agent is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+545 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-pr-agent