# PeerTube vs porta

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PeerTube | porta |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 ✓ | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.

porta ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, porta is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)
- [porta](https://selfhost.directory/project/porta) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/porta.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/peertube-vs-porta