PeerTubevsPicImpact
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PeerTube | PicImpact | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting | #14 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 375 | 1 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 9 |
| Latest release | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.
If you want the quickest setup, PicImpact is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
PeerTube details →PicImpact details →