# pcp vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pcp | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 079 | 93 018 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +1 271 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 7.2.2 · 7 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 62/100 for pcp, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for pcp.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; pcp needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 271 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/pcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pcp.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pcp-vs-uptime-kuma