# pcopy vs Shields

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pcopy | Shields |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 428 | 27 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +125 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shields scores 80/100 against 49/100 for pcopy, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; pcopy needs more configuration.

Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pcopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/pcopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pcopy.md)
- [Shields](https://selfhost.directory/project/shields) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shields.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pcopy-vs-shields