# payram-mcp vs xcash

> Two self-hosted [BTCPay Server alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/btcpay-server), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | payram-mcp | xcash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #123 of 209 in AI Agents | #29 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 158 | 189 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

payram-mcp scores 47/100 against 46/100 for xcash, so it is the safer default.

xcash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for payram-mcp.

If you want the quickest setup, payram-mcp is easier to run; xcash needs more configuration.

## Details

- [payram-mcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/payram-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payram-mcp.md)
- [xcash](https://selfhost.directory/project/xcash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xcash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/payram-mcp-vs-xcash