# Payload CMS vs Tidal Echo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Payload CMS | Tidal Echo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 45 566 ✓ | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +634 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.

Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tidal Echo.

If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; Tidal Echo needs more configuration.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+634 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)
- [Tidal Echo](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/payload-cms-vs-tidal-echo