# Payload CMS vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Payload CMS | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 45 561 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +649 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Payload CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/payload-cms-vs-rudderstack